The Coordinated Science Laboratory
National Center for Principled Leadership & Research Ethics

DLC References

DLC References

  1. Beauvais, E. (2020). Deliberation and non-deliberative communication. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 16(1).

  2. Carcasson, M. (2014). The critical role of local centers and institutes in advancing deliberative democracy. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 10(1).

  3. Carcasson, M., Black, L. W., & Sink, E. S. (2010). Communication studies and deliberative democracy: Current contributions and future possibilities. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 6(1).

  4. Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of curriculum studies, 38(5), 503-520.

  5. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. John Wiley & Sons.

  6. Jones, M. S., Cravens, A. E., Zarestky, J., Ngai, C., & Love, H. B. (2024). Facilitating psychological safety in science and research teams. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-12.

  7. Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator's guide to participatory decision-making. John Wiley & Sons.

  8. Nord, L., Ots, M., & Vozab, D. (2024). Deliberative communication. European Media Systems for Deliberative Communication, 13.

  9. Plemmons, D. K., Baranski, E. N., Harp, K., Lo, D. D., Soderberg, C. K., Errington, T. M., ... & Esterling, K. M. (2020). A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(3), 1389-1394.

  10. Polletta, F., & Gardner, B. G. (2018). The forms of deliberative communication. The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy, 69-85.

  11. von Schneidemesser, D., Oppold, D., & Stasiak, D. (2023). Diversity in Facilitation: Mapping Differences in Deliberative Designs. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 19(1).